AI Replacement Risk Calculator
Evaluate your job's AI replacement risk based on tasks, industry, and experience.
No saved calculations yet
AI automation is reshaping the job market faster than most industries can adapt. But replacement risk is not uniform — it depends on how much of your work involves routine pattern-matching vs. novel judgment, physical manipulation, or deep human connection. This calculator assesses your specific task mix, industry, and experience level to give you a realistic risk score and concrete steps to stay relevant.
Example Assessment
Role: Accounting clerk Tasks: data entry 60%, reconciliation 30%, client liaison 10% Industry: Finance
Risk Score Components
Routine task score = % routine tasks × 1.0 Industry exposure weight = 0.5–1.5× multiplier Experience offset = −5 to −20 points (senior roles) Physical task offset = −10 to −30 points Final score = (Routine × Industry weight) − Offsets
What Makes a Role More or Less Exposed
Jobs with high routine-task concentration, clear decision rules, and digital inputs are most automatable. Jobs requiring physical dexterity in unstructured environments, complex social judgment, or creative synthesis are much harder to automate. Experience helps — senior roles typically involve more judgment and less execution, reversing the risk equation.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does a high score mean I'll be unemployed?
No. It means parts of your role are automatable. Most jobs restructure rather than disappear — the question is whether you move up the value chain or down.
Which sectors are most at risk right now?
Data entry, basic customer service, document processing, and routine financial analysis are seeing rapid automation. Creative, physical, and relationship-driven roles less so.
What's the single best protective move?
Learn to use AI tools in your field rather than compete with them. Workflow automation fluency is becoming a baseline professional skill.
Are managers safe?
Middle management that focuses on status reporting and coordination is highly exposed. Managers who develop people and navigate ambiguity are much more resilient.